
ANNALES HISTORIQUES DE LA RÉVOLUTION FRANÇAISE Nº419 (1/2025)
Pour acheter ce numéro, contactez-nous
Recevez les numéros de l'année en cours et accédez à l'intégralité des articles en ligne.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was the subject of a veritable cult during the French Revolution, culminating in his entry into the Pantheon in 1794, precisely when the Thermidorian reaction restricted the rights of popular societies − an illustration of the tension between the celebration of Rousseau and at the same time his defense of the popular sovereignty. This tension, however, is not a contradiction: Rousseau was not an advocate of direct citizen participation in state affairs. His conception of the general will left no place for representation, conflict, or interest; it led to a theory characterized by a certain form of anti-political unanimity in the name of the sovereign people. Such a form of anti-politics was recuperated and adapted by various revolutionaries. It took the form of writings designed to adapt Rousseau’s ideas to the institutional context created by the Revolution, through a revival of representation − though combined with the power of surveillance. It also involved the partisan use of references to Rousseau to delegitimize as factious political opponents accused of usurping the sovereignty of the people. Such borrowings from Rousseau were made variously by the aristocrats against the Assembly, by the Girondins against the Jacobins, by the Jacobins against the moderate parliamentarians, by the Parisian popular movement against the representatives. This rhetoric contributed to the politicization of Rousseauist anti-politics.

